91��ɫ

Search or filter publications

Search publications Search

Filter by type:

Filter by publication type

• Book
• Book chapter
• Conference paper
• Journal article
• Patent
• Report
• Software

Filter by year:

Filter from 202620252024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000199919981997199619951994199319921991199019891988198719861985198419831982198119801979197819771976197519741973197219711970 to Filter to 202620252024202320222021202020192018201720162015201420132012201120102009200820072006200520042003200220012000199919981997199619951994199319921991199019891988198719861985198419831982198119801979197819771976197519741973197219711970

---

Search results

• Journal article
  Hausmann U, Czaja A, 2012,
  , DEEP-SEA RESEARCH PART I-OCEANOGRAPHIC RESEARCH PAPERS, Vol: 70, Pages: 60-72, ISSN: 0967-0637
  • Cite
  • Citations: 138
• Journal article
  Cui J, Yelle RV, Strobel DF, Mueller-Wodarg ICF, Snowden DS, Koskinen TT, Galand Met al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-PLANETS, Vol: 117, ISSN: 2169-9097
  • Cite
  • Citations: 45
• Journal article
  Shen C, Rong ZJ, Dunlop MW, Ma YH, Li X, Zeng G, Yan GQ, Wan WX, Liu ZX, Carr CM, Reme Het al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, Vol: 117, ISSN: 2169-9380
  • Cite
  • Citations: 34
• Journal article
  Moore L, Fischer G, Mueller-Wodarg I, Galand M, Mendillo Met al., 2012,
  , ICARUS, Vol: 221, Pages: 508-516, ISSN: 0019-1035
  • Cite
  • Citations: 11
• Journal article
  Gryspeerdt E, Stier P, 2012,
  , GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, Vol: 39, ISSN: 0094-8276
  • Cite
  • Citations: 78
• Journal article
  Cargill PJ, Vlahos L, Baumann G, Drake JF, Nordlund Aet al., 2012,
  , SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, Vol: 173, Pages: 223-245, ISSN: 0038-6308
  • Cite
  • Citations: 67
• Journal article
  Matteini L, Hellinger P, Landi S, Trávníček PM, Velli Met al., 2012,
  , Space Science Reviews, Vol: 172, Pages: 373-396, ISSN: 0038-6308
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Balogh A, Bykov A, Lin R, Raymond J, Scholer Met al., 2012,
  , SPACE SCIENCE REVIEWS, Vol: 173, Pages: 1-4, ISSN: 0038-6308
  • Cite
  • Citations: 3
• Journal article
  Cargill PJ, Bradshaw SJ, Klimchuk JA, 2012,
  , ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, Vol: 758, ISSN: 0004-637X
  • Cite
  • Citations: 64
• Journal article
  Moestl C, Farrugia CJ, Kilpua EKJ, Jian LK, Liu Y, Eastwood JP, Harrison RA, Webb DF, Temmer M, Odstrcil D, Davies JA, Rollett T, Luhmann JG, Nitta N, Mulligan T, Jensen EA, Forsyth R, Lavraud B, de Koning CA, Veronig AM, Galvin AB, Zhang TL, Anderson BJet al., 2012,
  , ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, Vol: 758, ISSN: 0004-637X
  • Cite
  • Citations: 105
• Journal article
  Chen CHK, Mallet A, Schekochihin AA, Horbury TS, Wicks RT, Bale SDet al., 2012,
  , The Astrophysical Journal, Vol: 758, Pages: 120-120

  We present a measurement of the scale-dependent, three-dimensional structureof the magnetic field fluctuations in inertial range solar wind turbulence withrespect to a local, physically motivated coordinate system. The Alfvenicfluctuations are three-dimensionally anisotropic, with the sense of thisanisotropy varying from large to small scales. At the outer scale, the magneticfield correlations are longest in the local fluctuation direction, consistentwith Alfven waves. At the proton gyroscale, they are longest along the localmean field direction and shortest in the direction perpendicular to the localmean field and the local field fluctuation. The compressive fluctuations arehighly elongated along the local mean field direction, although axiallysymmetric perpendicular to it. Their large anisotropy may explain why they arenot heavily damped in the solar wind.

  • Abstract
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Ceppi P, Hwang Y-T, Frierson DMW, Hartmann DLet al., 2012,
  , Geophysical 91��ɫ Letters, Vol: 39, Pages: 1-5, ISSN: 0094-8276

  [1] Substantial biases in shortwave cloud forcing (SWCF) of up to ±30 W m−2are found in the midlatitudes of the Southern Hemisphere in the historical simulations of 34 CMIP5 coupled general circulation models. The SWCF biases are shown to induce surface temperature anomalies localized in the midlatitudes, and are significantly correlated with the mean latitude of the eddy‐driven jet, with a negative SWCF bias corresponding to an equatorward jet latitude bias. Aquaplanet model experiments are performed to demonstrate that the jet latitude biases are primarily induced by the midlatitude SWCF anomalies, such that the jet moves toward (away from) regions of enhanced (reduced) temperature gradients. The results underline the necessity of accurately representing cloud radiative forcings in state‐of‐the‐art coupled models.

  • Abstract
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Graven HD, Gruber N, Key R, Khatiwala S, Giraud Xet al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-OCEANS, Vol: 117, ISSN: 2169-9275
  • Cite
  • Citations: 104
• Journal article
  Christophe B, Spilker LJ, Anderson JD, André N, Asmar SW, Aurnou J, Banfield D, Barucci A, Bertolami O, Bingham R, Brown P, Cecconi B, Courty J-M, Dittus H, Fletcher LN, Foulon B, Francisco F, Gil PJS, Glassmeier KH, Grundy W, Hansen C, Helbert J, Helled R, Hussmann H, Lamine B, Lämmerzahl C, Lamy L, Lehoucq R, Lenoir B, Levy A, Orton G, Páramos J, Poncy J, Postberg F, Progrebenko SV, Reh KR, Reynaud S, Robert C, Samain E, Saur J, Sayanagi KM, Schmitz N, Selig H, Sohl F, Spilker TR, Srama R, Stephan K, Touboul P, Wolf Pet al., 2012,
  , Experimental Astronomy, Vol: 34, Pages: 203-242, ISSN: 0922-6435
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Tinetti G, Beaulieu JP, Henning T, Meyer M, Micela G, Ribas I, Stam D, Swain M, Krause O, Ollivier M, Pace E, Swinyard B, Aylward A, van Boekel R, Coradini A, Encrenaz T, Snellen I, Zapatero-Osorio MR, Bouwman J, Cho JY-K, du Foresto VC, Guillot T, Lopez-Morales M, Mueller-Wodarg I, Palle E, Selsis F, Sozzetti A, Ade PAR, Achilleos N, Adriani A, Agnor CB, Afonso C, Allende Prieto C, Bakos G, Barber RJ, Barlow M, Batista V, Bernath P, Bezard B, Borde P, Brown LR, Cassan A, Cavarroc C, Ciaravella A, Cockell C, Coustenis A, Danielski C, Decin L, De Kok R, Demangeon O, Deroo P, Doel P, Drossart P, Fletcher LN, Focardi M, Forget F, Fossey S, Fouque P, Frith J, Galand M, Gaulme P, Gonzalez Hernandez JI, Grasset O, Grassi D, Grenfell JL, Griffin MJ, Griffith CA, Groezinger U, Guedel M, Guio P, Hainaut O, Hargreaves R, Hauschildt PH, Heng K, Heyrovsky D, Hueso R, Irwin P, Kaltenegger L, Kervella P, Kipping D, Koskinen TT, Kovacs G, La Barbera A, Lammer H, Lellouch E, Leto G, Lopez Valverde MA, Lopez-Puertas M, Lovis C, Maggio A, Maillard JP, Maldonado Prado J, Marquette JB, Martin-Torres FJ, Maxted P, Miller S, Molinari S, Montes D, Moro-Martin A, Moses JI, Mousis O, Nguyen Tuong N, Nelson R, Orton GS, Pantin E, Pascale E, Pezzuto S, Pinfield D, Poretti E, Prinja R, Prisinzano L, Rees JM, Reiners A, Samuel B, Sanchez-Lavega A, Sanz Forcada J, Sasselov D, Savini G, Sicardy B, Smith A, Stixrude L, Strazzulla G, Tennyson J, Tessenyi M, Vasisht G, Vinatier S, Viti S, Waldmann I, White GJ, Widemann T, Wordsworth R, Yelle R, Yung Y, Yurchenko SNet al., 2012,
  , EXPERIMENTAL ASTRONOMY, Vol: 34, Pages: 311-353, ISSN: 0922-6435
  • Cite
  • Citations: 108
• Journal article
  Orr A, Bracegirdle TJ, Hosking JS, Jung T, Haigh JD, Phillips T, Feng Wet al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, Vol: 69, Pages: 2917-2932, ISSN: 0022-4928
  • Cite
  • Citations: 28
• Journal article
  Graham DB, Cairns IH, Prabhakar DR, Ergun RE, Malaspina DM, Bale SD, Goetz K, Kellogg PJet al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, Vol: 117, ISSN: 2169-9380
  • Cite
  • Citations: 23
• Journal article
  Hasegawa H, Zhang H, Lin Y, Sonnerup BUO, Schwartz SJ, Lavraud B, Zong Q-Get al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, Vol: 117, ISSN: 2169-9380
  • Cite
  • Citations: 22
• Journal article
  Cao H, Russell CT, Wicht J, Christensen UR, Dougherty MKet al., 2012,
  , ICARUS, Vol: 221, Pages: 388-394, ISSN: 0019-1035
  • Cite
  • Citations: 33
• Journal article
  Southwood D, 2012,
  , NATURE, Vol: 488, Pages: 451-453, ISSN: 0028-0836
  • Cite
  • Citations: 2
• Journal article
  Eastwood JP, Phan TD, Fear RC, Sibeck DG, Angelopoulos V, Oieroset M, Shay MAet al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, Vol: 117, ISSN: 2169-9380
  • Cite
  • Citations: 44
• Journal article
  Carboni E, Thomas G, Sayer A, Siddans R, Poulsen C, Grainger R, Ahn C, Antoine D, Bevan S, Braak R, Brindley H, DeSouza-Machado S, Deuze J, Diner D, Ducos F, Grey W, Hsu C, Kalashnikova O, Kahn R, North P, Salustro C, Smith A, Tanre D, Torres O, Veihelmann Bet al., 2012,
  , Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol: 5, Pages: 1973-2002

  This work provides a comparison of satellite retrievals of Saharan desert dust aerosol optical depth (AOD) during a strong dust event through March 2006. In this event, a large dust plume was transported over desert, vegetated, and ocean surfaces. The aim is to identify the differences between current datasets. The satellite instruments considered are AATSR, AIRS, MERIS, MISR, MODIS, OMI, POLDER, and SEVIRI. An interesting aspect is that the different algorithms make use of different instrument characteristics to obtain retrievals over bright surfaces. These include multi-angle approaches (MISR, AATSR), polarisation measurements (POLDER), single-view approaches using solar wavelengths (OMI, MODIS), and the thermal infrared spectral region (SEVIRI, AIRS). Differences between instruments, together with the comparison of different retrieval algorithms applied to measurements from the same instrument, provide a unique insight into the performance and characteristics of the various techniques employed. As well as the intercomparison between different satellite products, the AODs have also been compared to co-located AERONET data. Despite the fact that the agreement between satellite and AERONET AODs is reasonably good for all of the datasets, there are significant differences between them when compared to each other, especially over land. These differences are partially due to differences in the algorithms, such as assumptions about aerosol model and surface properties. However, in this comparison of spatially and temporally averaged data, it is important to note that differences in sampling, related to the actual footprint of each instrument on the heterogeneous aerosol field, cloud identification and the quality control flags of each dataset can be an important issue.

  • Abstract
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Klein KG, Howes GG, TenBarge JM, Bale SD, Chen CHK, Salem CSet al., 2012,
  , The Astrophysical Journal, Vol: 755, Pages: 159-159, ISSN: 0004-637X
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Shindell DT, Voulgarakis A, Faluvegi G, Milly Get al., 2012,
  , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, Vol: 12, Pages: 6969-6982
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Andriopoulou M, Roussos E, Krupp N, Paranicas C, Thomsen M, Krimigis S, Dougherty MK, Glassmeier K-Het al., 2012,
  , ICARUS, Vol: 220, Pages: 503-513, ISSN: 0019-1035
  • Cite
  • Citations: 47
• Journal article
  Simon S, Kriegel H, Saur J, Wennmacher A, Neubauer FM, Roussos E, Motschmann U, Dougherty MKet al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, Vol: 117, ISSN: 2169-9380
  • Cite
  • Citations: 39
• Journal article
  Ray LC, Galand M, Moore LE, Fleshman Bet al., 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-SPACE PHYSICS, Vol: 117, ISSN: 2169-9380
  • Cite
  • Citations: 16
• Journal article
  Chen CHK, Salem CS, Bonnell JW, Mozer FS, Bale SDet al., 2012,
  , Physical Review Letters, Vol: 109, Pages: 035001-035001, ISSN: 0031-9007
  • Cite
• Journal article
  Erdos G, Balogh A, 2012,
  , ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, Vol: 753, ISSN: 0004-637X
  • Cite
  • Citations: 13
• Journal article
  Simpson IR, Blackburn M, Haigh JD, 2012,
  , JOURNAL OF THE ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES, Vol: 69, Pages: 2152-2170, ISSN: 0022-4928
  • Cite
  • Citations: 20

This data is extracted from the Web of Science and reproduced under a licence from Thomson Reuters. You may not copy or re-distribute this data in whole or in part without the written consent of the Science business of Thomson Reuters.